I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which
also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved…
1 Corinthians 15:1-2
Note: As I was researching, I found I
really couldn’t say most of this better than how gotquestions.org
put it. Please be aware most of the
gospel contrasting is directly copied from gotquestions.org and is not my own work.
Why
four gospels? Each gospel was written for a
specific audience, each emphasizing different aspects of Christ’s life. Why not
just one big gospel? Early law stated the necessity of more than one witness to
verify a testimony, and all four accounts match up.
“Well, they don’t match up exactly,” you might say (I thought
the same thing). Tell me, if all four gospels written by four different people
matched up word for word, would you find that more credible?
Which gospel is best? Yes. They all have distinct purposes and styles, and all are inspired by the Holy Spirit. For your
reading and studying pleasure, I have a small comparison and contrast of each
gospel with its respective author, audience, and characteristics.
Matthew
Audience: Matthew was writing to a Hebrew audience.
Objective: One of his purposes was to show from Jesus' genealogy and
fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies that He was the long-expected Messiah,
and thus should be believed in. Matthew's emphasis is that Jesus is the
promised King, the “Son of David.” The phrase “This was to fulfill the
prophesy…” appears repeatedly in Matthew.
Characteristic: Matthew was a tax collector, number-oriented, and often
records the number of people at events.
Mark
Audience: Mark wrote for a Gentile audience.
Objective: His Gentile focus is brought out by his not including
things important to Jewish readers (genealogies, Christ's controversies with
Jewish leaders, frequent Old Testament references). Mark emphasizes Christ as
the suffering Servant, the One who came not to be served, but to serve and give
His life a ransom for many.
Additional note: This is a faster-paced, action-packed gospel, highlighting
Christ’s miracles and works here on earth.
Luke
Audience: Because Luke specifically wrote for the benefit of
Theophilus, a Gentile, his gospel was composed with a Gentile audience in mind.
Objective: His intent is to show that a Christian's faith is based
upon historically reliable and verifiable events. Luke often refers to Christ
as the “Son of Man,” emphasizing His humanity. Characteristic: He was a detail-oriented doctor and diligent
historian and shares many details that are not found in the other gospel
accounts.
Additional notes: Luke also wrote Acts.
John
Audience:
Mixed
Objective:
John emphasizes the deity of Christ, as is seen
in his use of such phrases as “the Word was God,” “the Savior of the World,” “Son
of God” (used repeatedly) and several “I Am” statements by Jesus. John also
emphasizes the fact of Jesus' humanity, desiring to show the error of a
religious sect of his day who did not believe Christ’s humanity. John 20: 30-31
reveals his overall purpose: “Jesus did
many other miraculous signs in the presence of his disciples, which are not
recorded in this book. But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is
the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his
name.”
Additional note:
John writes in a differently layout than the first three “Synoptic Gospels.”
Although
all four gospels differ from each other in style and audience, each accurately
accounts Christ’s life for us to appreciate who
He is and what He has done for us so that we may have life through faith in
Him.
Klipsie
Sources:
Gotquestions.org
Journal33.org