"Patience is a virtue."
We're all familiar with that cliché, and many of us know that patience is
listed by Paul in Galatians 5:22-23 as among the Fruits of the Spirit. So
there's no disputing that the Christian ought to be patient. But as with most
of the virtues, the biblical writers assume that we know what patience is and
don't give an explicit definition. But do we? Could you define patience if you
were asked? And, to make things more tricky, could you do so without simply
citing examples of patience?
When
defined as "waiting without complaint," patience might seem to be a
morally insignificant trait. What's so virtuous about not complaining? In
itself, not complaining carries no particular virtue. Suppose a person awaits
the arrival of a friend from out of town, and she spends the time happily
reading or watching television. We wouldn't say that, simply because she's not
complaining, she exhibits patience in this case. Something else must be
required to make one's lack of complaint virtuous. That something is
discomfort. It's because a circumstance is uncomfortable for someone that we
find her refusal to complain remarkable and thus regard her as patient.
So to improve the initial
definition above, to be patient is to endure discomfort without complaint. This
calls into play some other virtues, specifically: self-control, humility, and
generosity. That is, patience is not a fundamental virtue so much as a complex
of other virtues. An example from the life of Christ illustrates this. Jesus
was very patient with his disciples. They were sometimes thickheaded, lazy,
selfish, and slow to believe. Even from a merely human standpoint, we can see
how frustrating they must have been. How much more irritating it would be for
God Incarnate to interact daily with these men. In spite of Jesus' miracles and
words of wisdom, they were focused upon themselves and wavered in their belief
about who he really was. To say that was uncomfortable for Jesus would be an
understatement. Yet do we find Him railing at His disciples over their
foolishness and stupidity? Or making fun of them when they make mistakes?
Occasionally He does remark that His disciples are slow to believe, or He asks rhetorically how long they will
fail to have faith in Him, but these are always appropriate reminders about
just what was at stake for them. These were fitting and useful rebukes, not
petty venting.
Notice that Jesus' refusal to
complain about his irritating disciples can be described as an exercise of
self-control. Surely He would have been justified in blistering them with
insults. It's worth noting that His omniscience guaranteed that every possible
joke and embarrassing remark was at His disposal on any particular occasion.
This makes His self-control even more admirable. Also, His refusal to complain
involves humility, the conscious decision to lower Himself by not exercising His right, as the holy man He was, to judge and dismiss his friends because of
their faults. We might even say this is a form of mercy. Finally, Jesus'
refusal to complain about his disciples is generous. In spite of their vice and
thick-headedness, He remained no less committed to them and served them
increasingly as their failures became more outstanding.
Haron
0 comments:
Post a Comment